What Were the First Stars Like?

Short answer: We don’t really know.

Artist’s conception of early star formation
Artist’s conception of early star formation The first stars are thought to have formed as early as 100 million years after the big bang, when dense regions of hydrogen and helium collapsed under their own gravitational pull. Once the pressure and temperature in the center of the cloud was high enough, hydrogen atoms began to fuse together, releasing energy in the form of light. CREDIT: Adolf Schaller for STScI

Four hundred thousand years after the big bang, the universe was a cold, dark fog of hydrogen and helium atoms. Less than 400 million years later, it had begun to shine with the light of infant galaxies. Sometime in between, the first stars must have formed.

What were these stars made of? How big and bright were they? How long did they live, and what happened to them when they died? Do any still exist?

The fact is, no one really knows exactly what the first stars were like. Not even the most powerful telescopes operating today—space telescopes like Hubble, Spitzer, and Chandra, and ground-based telescopes like Keck and ALMA—have been able to detect them. But we do have some ideas.

Universe Timeline
Timeline of the universe Although we are not sure exactly when the first stars began to shine, we know that they must have formed sometime after the era of Recombination, when hydrogen and helium atoms formed (380,000 years after the big bang), and before the oldest-known galaxies existed (400 million years after the big bang). The ultraviolet light emitted by the first stars broke down the neutral hydrogen gas filling the universe into hydrogen ions and free electrons, initiating the era of Reionization and the end of the Dark Ages of the universe. CREDIT: STScI GET THE FULL IMAGE IN RESOURCE GALLERY >

What were the first stars made of?

Short answer: Hydrogen and helium (and tiny amounts of lithium). That’s it.

Population III stars infographic
Composition of the first stars The first generation of stars, also known as Population III stars, were made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium. Later generations of stars, including the Sun, contain heavier elements like oxygen, carbon, and iron, which formed in the cores of earlier stars. CREDIT: STScI GET THE FULL IMAGE IN RESOURCE GALLERY >

Astronomers know that the first stars, officially known as Population III stars, must have been made almost solely of hydrogen and helium—the elements that formed as a direct result of the big bang. They would have contained none of the heavier elements like carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and iron that are found in stars shining today. In other words, Population III stars were metal-free. (Astronomers refer to any element heavier than helium as a metal.)

This might seem like a bold statement given that we have not actually observed any metal-free stars. But as with all scientific claims, it is based on evidence and reasoning: We know from observations, experiments, and calculations that only hydrogen and helium (and minute amounts of lithium) were formed directly after the big bang. The only way that heavier elements like carbon, oxygen, and iron can form is by fusion of lighter elements in the cores of stars. So until the first stars began to form them, none of these elements existed in the universe. The first stars must have been metal-free.

HD 140283 or the Methuselah star
Ancient star, but not one of the first One of the oldest known stars ever observed is a subgiant star in the Milky Way, just 190 light-years from Earth. The star, known as HD 140283 or the Methuselah star, appears to be almost as old as the universe. However, we know it is not one of the first stars because of it contains metals that must have formed in the core or during the explosion of even earlier stars. CREDIT: Digitized Sky Survey (DSS), STScI/AURA, Palomar/Caltech, and UKSTU/AAO

How massive were the first stars?

Short answer: Probably really big, but maybe not.

Star mass infographic
Mass of the first stars The first stars were probably tens to hundreds of times the mass of the Sun, but might have been a lot smaller than this. CREDIT: STScI GET THE FULL IMAGE IN RESOURCE GALLERY >

Although astronomers are quite certain what the first stars were made of, they are less sure how massive they were.

Strangely, one constraint on the mass of metal-free stars comes from what we don’t see: Because we haven’t observed any metal-free stars, we are fairly certain that there could not have been many small ones. Small stars like the Sun last for billions of years. If small Population III stars were common, we should have detected some by now.

Extremely large stars, on the other hand, burn their fuel very quickly. A star 60 times the mass of the Sun lasts less than one million years. If all of the first generation of stars were extremely massive, none would still exist, and it would make sense that we have not seen any.

Star lifespan infographic
Lifespan of the first stars A star 60 times the mass of the Sun would shine for less than a million years. If the first stars were all this massive, they would have burned out long ago. CREDIT: STScI GET THE FULL IMAGE IN RESOURCE GALLERY >

Additional evidence for the size of the first stars comes from computer models that simulate how large clouds of hydrogen, helium, and dark matter could cool and collapse to form stars in the early universe. These simulations also suggest that it takes a lot more matter to form a metal-free star than one with even a small proportion of metals. Combined with the fact that we have not seen any metal-free stars, this leads many astronomers to think that the first stars were probably very massive, perhaps ranging between about 10 and 300 times the mass of the Sun.

How hot and bright were the first stars?

Short answer: Probably a lot hotter and brighter than the Sun.

The temperature and brightness of a star is directly related to its mass: The more massive the star is, the hotter and brighter it is. If the first stars were very massive, they also must have been extremely hot and bright. A star 100 times the mass of the Sun, for example, would have a surface temperature around 100,000 kelvin and would shine with the energy of 1 millions Suns.

Star temperature infographic
Temperature, Brightness, and Color of the first stars Massive Population III stars could have been as hot as 100,000 kelvin—more than 90,000 degrees hotter than the Sun. The hotter any object is, the more electromagnetic radiation (light) it gives off, and the higher energy the radiation is. Population III stars would have been much brighter than the Sun, giving off mostly high-energy ultraviolet rather than visible light. CREDIT: STScI GET THE FULL IMAGE IN RESOURCE GALLERY >
Ionization by light from the first stars
Ionization by light from the first stars Ultraviolet light is a type of ionizing radiation. It has the ability to separate electrons from atomic nuclei, converting neutral atoms into charged particles called ions. UV light from the first stars was absorbed by hydrogen atoms, causing them to be ionized. CREDIT: STScI GET THE FULL IMAGE IN RESOURCE GALLERY >

If the first stars were this hot, they must have been giving off enormous amounts of high-energy radiation. While the Sun emits most of its energy in the optical part of the electromagnetic spectrum—the visible light that we are all familiar with—almost all of the light emitted by a star with a temperature of 100,000 kelvin would be in the form of ultraviolet light, which is invisible to human eyes. Astronomers think that it was the ultraviolet radiation emitted by the first stars that began to ionize the universe, lifting the fog of opaque neutral hydrogen that filled the universe during the so-called Dark Ages.

What happened to the first stars?

Short answer: They burned out, exploded, or collapsed.

Highly distorted supernova remnant, W49B
Remnants of a recent supernova Many of the first stars would have ended their lives in massive supernova explosions. The dusty remains of these stars, including the metals formed in their cores, would have become the building blocks of the stars we see today. This image shows the X-ray, infrared, and radio waves from W49B, a young supernova remnant roughly 26,000 light-years away. CREDIT: X-ray: NASA/CXC/MIT/L.Lopez et al.; Infrared: Palomar; Radio: NSF/NRAO/VLA

Based on what we know about physics, we know that if any of the earliest stars were smaller than 0.9 times the mass of the Sun, they should still be shining today. But if they were very massive, they would have had extremely short lifetimes, burning up their fuel quickly and dying within a few million years of forming. What exactly happened to them would depend on their mass.

Computer models show that stars greater than 10 and less than about 140 times the mass of the Sun would have ended in supernova explosions, the metals that formed in their cores blown out and dispersed into the surrounding universe. The remains of these stars would have collapsed to form neutron stars or black holes.

Larger metal-free stars, up to about 300 solar masses, might have exploded in a strange type of supernova. These explosion would have blasted every bit of the star out in all directions, leaving nothing behind—no neutron star or black hole. The only signs of these stars would be found in the chemical composition of later stars that formed from their exploded remains.

Even larger metal-free stars would have collapsed directly to form black holes, taking everything with them without even exploding first. While these stars would not have contributed matter to form new stars, they may have influenced galaxies in other ways. It may be that these black holes were the seeds of supermassive black holes found at the centers of galaxies today.

Will we ever be able to see the first stars directly?

Short answer: Maybe, if we are very lucky.

So far, the only real evidence we have for the first stars is in the tracks they’ve left behind: the metals they formed that we see in later generations of stars; the effects of their ionizing radiation on the primordial gas in the universe; and perhaps their remnant black holes. If the first stars were massive and short-lived, any that existed nearby are long gone.

Even if they no longer exist, it is theoretically still possible to see them. Telescopes like Hubble allow us to see billions of light-years away and thus billions of years back in time. When the James Webb Space Telescope is launched, it will have the advantage of being able to detect even dimmer infrared light. Although most of the light given off the first massive stars was in the ultraviolet part of the spectrum when it was emitted, the universe has expanded so much since then that much of it is now in the visible and infrared. (Hubble also covers this portion of the spectrum, but Webb’s mirror is much larger, allowing it to detect much lower levels of light.)

Light given off by Population III stars
Redshift of the first stars Since the first stars formed more than 13.4 billion years ago, their light has stretched with the expansion of space, becoming dimmer and redder over time. The James Webb Space Telescope is designed to detect the very dim light in the red and infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum. CREDIT: STScI GET THE FULL IMAGE IN RESOURCE GALLERY >

But as powerful as Webb is, it will still be difficult to see individual stars that far back in time. Although these stars were extremely bright, they are so far away that very little of their light actually reaches us.

We will almost certainly be able to see ancient galaxies that contain first-generation stars, and will be able to make some inferences about individual stars from the light coming from the galaxy as a whole. But galaxies contain hundreds of thousands to millions of stars, each at a different point in its lifecycle. Even if some of the stars are metal-free, new stars will have begun forming from the metallic stardust scattered through the galaxy.

Making things even more difficult, the fog of neutral hydrogen gas that filled the universe when the very first stars were forming would have absorbed their ultraviolet light. Until the ultraviolet radiation ionized enough atoms to allow light to pass through, our view of the first stars would be blocked.

Even so, we might get lucky. We may be able to see individual stars with the help of a strong gravitational lens: a cluster of galaxies that forms a natural magnifying glass in just the right place in the sky. Maybe we will catch the bright explosion of a Population III star at the very end of its life. Maybe some of the first stars were very small and are still shining, visible in nearby galaxies—perhaps even in our own Milky Way.

SPT0615-JD Lensed Galaxy
Ancient galaxy Galaxy SPT0615-JD, imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope as it existed 13.3 billion years ago, may contain some of the first generation of stars that formed in the universe. This small, distant galaxy is visible in such detail because it is magnified by the gravitational effects of a cluster of much closer galaxies. Astronomers think that gravitational lensing may make it possible for us to observe some of the first star clusters directly using the James Webb Space Telescope. CREDIT: NASA, ESA, and B. Salmon (STScI) 
  • email
  • facebook
  • twitter